Factual · Powerful · Original · Iconoclastic
Under the subject line of "Hexavaent Chromium" (it's "hexavalent") Nancy [omitted] wrote:
Dear Mr.Fumento,
I am researching the P G & E/Hinkley, California case and have read some of your writings. As long as you short cut and use information provided by P G & E scientists, physicians and their reports to back your 'facts' you will always come out suspect. For years, the tobacco industry claimed through their scientist and doctors that smoking in no way caused cancer, we now know they were wrong. Surveys have been done that have indicated that for enough money there are many doctors and scientists who will 'sell' themselves and print whatever is wanted by those providing the money.
An interested law student
My response:
I didn't use any information from PG & E scientists. Consult my articles on my website. And please, stop with the tobacco comparisons. Just because somebody somewhere says their product isn't as dangerous as others claim it is doesn't make them another BIG TOBACCO. I insist that reading my material won't make you go blind. Does that put me on par with the makers of Camel cigarettes?
Well, maybe you shouldn't answer that.
Also, please learn how to use quotation marks if you are to join the legions of tort lawyers.